GLGridiron LegendsThe game. The people. The evidence.

Statistics & context

Make an era comparison reproducible

Readers should be able to follow your choices.

Gridiron Legends editorial · October 7, 2026

A worn leather American football beside a blank notebook on a wooden desk.

The historical context

A historical comparison begins with a question and a defined set of records. State which players, seasons and measures you include before drawing a conclusion. Rule and schedule history provide context, while the statistic’s definition determines what the selected values actually measure. Your selection choices should remain visible to the reader.

A clearer way to read the evidence

Show the source identities and any calculations you performed. Explain why you selected a particular rate or total, and identify context that the table cannot capture. Present the conclusion as an interpretation supported by those choices, not as an inevitable verdict delivered by a number. A reproducible comparison remains useful even when another reader chooses a different, clearly stated method.

Keep in your notes

  • Define the comparison question.
  • Show sources and calculations.
  • Label the conclusion as interpretation.

Sources and further reading